Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4046 13
Original file (NR4046 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490

SUN
Docket No: 04046-13
14 May 2014

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United
States Code, section 1552,

It is noted that since your discharge is less than 15 years old,
you may apply to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB}) for a
possible change of your narrative reason for separation. I have
enclosed NDRB's application form for your convenience.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 7 May 2014. The names and votes of the members of
the panel will be furnished upon request. Your allegations of
error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with
administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by
the Board consisted of your application, together with all
Material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and
applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient
to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.

You enlisted in the Navy and began a period of active duty on

6 April 2004. However, based on your Certificate of Release or
Discharge from Active Duty (DD Form 214), you received an
honorable discharge due to misconduct on 5 November 2010. At
that time you were assigned an RE-4 reentry code.
The Board, in its review of your application, carefully weighed
all potentially mitigating factors, such as your record of
service and desire to change your RE-4 reentry code.

Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not
sufficient to warrant such a change of your RE-4 reentry given,
what it appears to be, a pattern of misconduct. In this regard,
you were assigned the appropriate reentry code based on your
circumstances. Accordingly, your application has been denied.

The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished
upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

2s.

(a ke
ROBERT D ALMAN

Acting Executive Director

Enclosure

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8265 13

    Original file (NR8265 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 September 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The Board did not consider whether to upgrade your discharge or change the reason for separation because you did not request such action, and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3446-13

    Original file (NR3446-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 February 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official - naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5170 13

    Original file (NR5170 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 April 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. You exercised your procedural right to have your case heard by an administrative discharge board (ADB).

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5410 13

    Original file (NR5410 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 June 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof,-your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Finally, Sailors discharged by reason of a condition, not a disability would normally be assigned an RE-4 reentry code.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0729 14

    Original file (NR0729 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 July 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. You must first apply to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB).

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3308-13

    Original file (NR3308-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    = A three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in.executive session, considered your application on 12 February 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in _ support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, " regulations, and policies. An RE- 4 reentry code must be assigned to all Marines discharged due to — an SPCM conviction.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2737 13

    Original file (NR2737 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 May 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0825 14

    Original file (NR0825 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 July 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR9118 13

    Original file (NR9118 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 June 2014. you waived your right to have your case heard by an administrative discharge board (ADB). The Board did not consider whether your character of service and narrative reason for discharge should be changed due to the fact that your discharge is less than 15 years old, so you must first apply to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB).

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR9464-13

    Original file (NR9464-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 February 2014. The Board also considered the report of the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) dated 26 February - 2009, a copy of which is attached. The Board, in its review of your entire record, carefully considered all potentially mitigating factors, such as your youth, post service good conduct, current desire to remove your ~ NUP, and upgrade your...